logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.19 2016고합607
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant connected to “C”, which is a smartphone, read and exchanged letters describing sexual traffic by D (the age of 17) a juvenile who is a sexual traffic, and then intended to give money to D and engage in sexual traffic.

1. On April 18, 2015, the Defendant paid KRW 60,00 as the price for sexual traffic after having paid D in a numberless taxi located in the E-F parking lot located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which was operated by the Defendant, at around 18:00, and caused D to engage in similarity in a manner that stimulates the Defendant’s sexual organ by hand.

2. On June 6, 2015, at around 22:00, the Defendant paid D with the price of sexual traffic at around 70,000 won at the store of the trade name and insular products located in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant off the clothes of D, and caused D to perform similar acts in such a way as to stimulate the Defendant’s sexual organ by hand.

3. On December 2015, the Defendant was operated at the time when he/she had a house E located in the parking lot in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 23:00.

G Payment of D 60,00 won as the price for sexual traffic in the G Mak-gu transportation taxi, and it caused D to engage in similarity behavior in a way that stimulates the defendant's sexual organ by hand.

4. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant paid D 60,000 won as the price for sexual traffic in the taxi set up in the above parking lot around the lower order 24:00, and caused D to engage in similarity behavior in a way that stimulates the Defendant’s sexual organ by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant purchased the sex of juvenile four times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol and stenographic record Acts and subordinate statutes to D;

1. Article 13 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, which prescribes the relevant legal provisions and punishment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.

arrow