A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 7, 2015, at around 18:15, the Defendant: (a) demanded the Defendant to leave the “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s restaurant business by force by force, such as: (b) the Defendant’s failure to perform his/her duties, i.e., going on and going on the floor of the Defendant; (c) whether the Defendant was in his/her inside or her house, or whether he/she was in his/her mother; (d) the police officer called the Defendant upon receiving a report, recommended the Defendant to return home; and (e) the police officer called the Defendant, who solicited the Defendant to take a bath, she interfered with the Defendant’s restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report at the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph (1), made a public insult of the victim by openly 10 minutes of the victim, such as “I am, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, etc., on the part of the victim, who was the victim at the Busan Jinjin Police Station that was sent to the Defendant at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1).”

3. On February 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault, such as, on the hand, the Defendant: (b) committed an act of assaulting the H’s chest on his hand by her hand, breaking out the clothes of H, provokinging down, and walking down the h’s left part of the h’s chest with his hand, and walking down the h’s chest on the hand, by a hand, at the front of the said “Ecafeteria”; (c) the h’s police box affiliated with the Busan Jinjin-gu Police Station, which was called the Defendant to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender for an insulting offense of insult.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the arrest of the police officer H in flagrante.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, G, D, and I;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 136(1), 314(1), and 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;