A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1171"

1. The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of a vehicle which has a gallon route for the purpose of violating the Road Traffic Act (not taking measures after accidents) and the Road Traffic Act (not obtaining a license).

On April 23, 2016, the Defendant driven the said truck without obtaining a driver's license at around 01:50 on April 23, 2016, while driving the said truck and driving the one-lane road at the Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do at Jeju at a Han-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si, the Defendant failed to immediately stop and take necessary measures after receiving the back portion of E6.5 tons of the truck, which is a transport owned by a limited company that is parked on the right side of the said vehicle, from the front part of the said vehicle.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) by the Defendant escaped after causing the above traffic accident, and was discovered to the G, etc. belonging to the Jeju Western Police Station, which was sent to the scene after receiving an accident report while hiding under the wall of the field near it, and was voluntarily carried out by the F police box, and the Defendant continued to proceed from the patrol vehicle to the emergency hospital located at the Jeju H by the 119 emergency vehicle.

On April 23, 2016, from around 03:59 to 04:29 the same day, the Defendant snife the Defendant at the emergency room of the pertinent I Hospital from the Jeju Western Police Station, from K, etc., the Jeju Western Police Station guards, etc., and from the J’s position, and from considerable grounds to suspect that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as the Defendant’s dnifeing of alcohol together, and made a statement that he was under the influence of alcohol, etc., the Defendant was in compliance with a drinking test by inserting about 30 minutes of drinking, but the person continued to comply with the demand for a drinking test by a police officer without justifiable grounds, by avoiding this.

"2016 Highest 1385"

3. In fact, the Defendant, from August 31, 2015, operates a restaurant in Jeju L from August 31, 2015, in the same manner as the friendly job offers N.