A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:10 on June 18, 2014, the Defendant, at the construction site of Changwon-si Masanpo-si B, was asked about personal information from the slope E affiliated with the D District Unit, who was called to the site after having been reported by the Madung-si, Changwon-si, the Defendant: (a) sent to the site the question of why he was under the influence of alcohol; and (b) sent to the site the question of the personal information from the slope E belonging to the D District Unit E; and (c) carried out a bath, “I am am. am. am, I am, and you am.”

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning reporting management.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-1-4 months), i.e., the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months). [Determination of sentence] In order to establish the legal order of the State and eradicate the light of public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of official duties. However, in order to establish the law and order of the State and eradicate the light of the public authority, the defendant is against his mistake and is against himself, and