A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:00 on the D entertainment tavern located in Seosan City, Seosan-si; (b) confirmed the Defendant’s personal information, and (c) confirmed the Defendant’s personal information, the Defendant: (a) sent to the Gyeongnam-gu Police Station E-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) inspected the Defendant’s seat; (c) on the one hand, expressed a large amount of son, i.e., e., son, son, son, son, son, son, mari, mari, mari, mari, mari, etc.; and (d) sent one time to the police officer’s face to stop this.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to 112 reporting processing affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (6-1-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-1-4 months) / [decision of sentence] The fact that the defendant assaults a police officer who was dispatched from a drinking house to the police officer who was unsatisfing his/her behavior at his/her drinking house, and that the defendant was punished for the obstruction of performance of official duties in 2009 and 2012 is disadvantageous to the defendant, and that the defendant was not sentenced to a punishment exceeding a fine, and that there is no criminal record of the defendant being sentenced to a punishment exceeding a fine, and that it is favorable to the

In addition to the above circumstances, the sentence like the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case.