logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.01.19 2017고정233 (1)
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)등
Text

Defendant

A A Fines of 1.5 million won, Defendant B of a fine of 2 million won, Defendant C of a fine of 3 million won, and Defendant D of a fine of 1.5 million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants A, B, C, D, E, G, H, H, J, K, L, M, and N jointly committed the following crimes: (a) around 08:30 on February 3, 2017, Defendant A, C, and C entered into an open gate for the reason that the building was owned by W; (b) around 02:50 on February 4, 2017, the Defendants asserted “Y” as a matter of the ownership of the building at the building located in X in the Chang-si, Chang-si, Seoul; and (c) went into the public gate for the reason that the building was owned by W. The Defendants asserted “Y” on the part of the Plaintiff’s ownership of the building at the building located in X in the Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si, Seoul; and (d) went through a huckbuck.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

3. Defendant C and D’s co-related Defendants were the believers of W, and were dissatisfied with “Y” side as a matter of the ownership of the building in the building located X in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si around February 4, 2017. Defendant C and D suffered from the enormous injury to the victim due to the defect that he/she attempted to go beyond this wall P (19 tax) of the Victim P (19 tax) and the victim was frighted against the victim, and suffered from the injury of the victim, such as a fright, which had not been opened for about three weeks of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.

4. Defendants B, C, D, E, and F jointly committed the following crimes: (a) around 02:50 on February 4, 2017, at the building located X in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Defendants asserted “Y” side as a matter of the ownership of the building; and (b) at the place where the Defendants had already occupied, “Y” had the victim O (the age of 19) went beyond the wall to the floor so that the victim could not get out of the wall so that they could not get out of the wall; and (c) subsequently, the Defendants suffered injury to the victim, on several occasions, to the victim, such as a sugar, which had no one in the open space where approximately three weeks medical treatment is required.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.

5. Defendants U and V’ joint crimes are the believers of “Y”.

arrow