logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.11.24 2017고단3185
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 24, 2017, while the Defendant was prosecuted for violating the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits to the Daejeon District Court and was tried for the violation of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits, the Defendant paid retirement allowances to the workers B but did not prepare the written agreement, and was willing to receive a favorable judgment by arbitrarily preparing and submitting the written agreement in the name of B to the court.

1. On May 2017, the Defendant forged a private document: “Written Agreement, Name B (E) and F apartment No. 14-dong 1901, contact G at the time of the Dong-gu in Gangwon-do, the address of the Defendant, using a computer, and agreed to receive KRW 2 million on March 22, 2017, and receive KRW 670,000 and KRW 6770,000 on May 12, 2017 and receive KRW 6770,000,000,000,000,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,00

May 15, 2017, “B” was drawn up and printed out.

Defendant 1 modified the contact details with the Plaintiff’s contact details using the scriptive pension as above in the form of the agreement printed as above (replacement of the back part of the mobile phone No. H into I), and was kept by the said Company on the side of the name B of the said agreement.

B his seal has been affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of agreement in the name of private document B, which is a private document to prove facts.

2. On June 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) issued each forged agreement at the Daejeon District Court’s comprehensive civil petition office, which was located in Seo-gu, Daejeon District Court No. 78-ro 45 (Yinsan-dong) on June 2, 2017, to the employees in charge of the said court as if it was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of B’s written laws and regulations;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the violation of a private document selected for punishment: The occupation of exercising the private investigation document selected for a fine under Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the occupation of a fine under Article 234 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.

arrow