logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1989. 3. 28. 선고 88도1738 판결
[도로교통법위반][집37(1)형,566;공1989.5.15.(848),709]
Main Issues

Whether a vehicle driving without a notice of revocation of driver's license is a non-licensed driving during the absence of such notice (negative)

Summary of Judgment

When the Mayor/Do Governor revokes a driver's license, he/she shall notify the person who has obtained the driver's license pursuant to Article 53 of the Enforcement Decree of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 53 (2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act. Unless such notification is given, the cancellation of the driver's license cannot be effective, so the vehicle operation

[Reference Provisions]

Article 53 of the Enforcement Decree of the Road Traffic Act, Article 53 (2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Prosecutor

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon District Court Decision 87No440 delivered on May 19, 198

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

As to the Prosecutor’s Grounds of Appeal:

When the Mayor/Do Governor revokes a driver's license, he/she shall notify the person who has obtained the driver's license pursuant to Article 53 of the Enforcement Decree of the Road Traffic Act and Article 53 (2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act. However, the revocation of the driver's license cannot take effect during the absence of such notification. Therefore, the judgment of the court below that the Defendant's vehicle operation cannot be deemed a driver's license cannot be deemed a driver

The issue is groundless.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Yoon Young-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-대전지방법원 1988.5.19선고 87노440
기타문서