beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fine of 6,00,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment with prison labor of 6 months and fines of 4,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] Defendant C received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of gambling at the Jeonju District Court on May 26, 1997; on February 19, 2008, Defendant C was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million as a crime of gambling at the Jeonju District Court Eup branch on May 25, 2007; Defendant C received a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a fine for the same crime at the Jeonju District Court on March 31, 2008; on December 28, 201, Defendant C received a summary order of KRW 100,000 as a fine for the same crime; and on October 7, 2013, Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for gambling at the Daejeon District Court on July 28, 2013.
[Criminal facts]
1. The Defendants jointly committed the crimes of Defendants A and B conspired with D, etc. in sequence from June 2016, and opened a “san gambling place” under the name of “a general book” in order to exercise overall control over the establishment and operation of the gambling place, Defendant A and E play the role of “a tent” in the name of “fambling”, Defendant B, F, and G lending money to the participants of gambling, and H play the role of “fambts” in the name of “fambts” in which they share money, and “fambs” in other hearts such as coffees, coffees, etc. while gambling.
On July 9, 2016, from around 00:00 to around 04:00 of the same day, the Defendants prepared goods used for gambling, such as a tent, which was carried on a monthly-lane basis in the vicinity of the former Gun I, and installed a gambling house, and made D et al. al. al. divided into three folds by using Chapter 51 for 51 at the place where D et al. was recruited, and then selected a plaque by three tamp, and the highest side of which is the sum of three tamps, one time by which the sum of approximately 250 to 300,000 won was raised, and then tamp about 80,000 won was removed. The Defendants took advantage of the profits equivalent to 10% of D et al.