The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant, but the defendant has 7 times the same career as that of the defendant, and the defendant has repeatedly committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period. In particular, at least 4 cm in length, the defendant has continuously been administered phiphones in addition to the crime of this case. The defendant seems to have continuously administered phiphones, and the judgment below's punishment is the lowest between 1 and 6 months from 16 months to 6 months from the sentencing guidelines, which are the recommended range under the sentencing guidelines, and it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is particularly heavy even if followed. In full view of other various factors such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and result of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the judgment below's punishment is deemed reasonable, and the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.