The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The determination of the Defendant’s confessions and reflects the instant crime, and the Defendant, while operating a ship oil hold cleaning company, strengthens social infrastructure, such as being in charge of G of the Korean Ship Environmental Association, which is an incorporated association, and ties with his family members, and the Defendant plans to receive hospital treatment in the future, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant has the same kind of force twice for the defendant, and the defendant has already committed a drug crime and has been sentenced to suspended execution by the court, despite the fact that the above judgment has become final and conclusive, and again committed the crime of this case after having been sentenced to suspended execution by being sentenced to suspended execution by being sentenced to the court, the defendant's hair has been reactioned from the whole of the defendant's hair at least 40 meters long, and the defendant seems to have continuously administered philophones in addition to the crime of this case. In full view of other factors such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the court below

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.