logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.11.17 2015가합2366
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The summary of the claim and the judgment of the Plaintiff: (a) around October 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the supply of and demand for the new construction of D factories and office buildings on the Daegu-gu dong-gu C and two parcels; and (b) sought an amount equivalent to KRW 308,328,000 for the unpaid construction cost against the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant did not have any obligation to comply with the Plaintiff’s request, as the above construction contract was concluded between the Defendant and E Co., Ltd.; and (d) the Defendant did not have any obligation to

According to the evidence No. 1 and No. 1, the above construction contract was concluded between the defendant and E Co., Ltd., and the plaintiff is an internal director of E Co., Ltd., respectively, and since the plaintiff cannot be viewed as the contractor of the above construction contract, the plaintiff's claim for the remainder of construction contract under the above construction contract is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow