1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 31, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant, setting a deposit amount of KRW 12,594,00,000 for four parcels of land and storage facilities on the land, including 712-2,315, Masan-dong, Osan-si, Osan-si, the Defendant-owned, and KRW 12,594,00,000 for deposit money, KRW 33,400,00 for the rent month (excluding value-added tax), and from November 1, 2012 to October 31, 2019 for a fixed term of seven years (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

B. On October 31, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a sub-lease agreement (hereinafter “each sub-lease agreement of this case”) with the Hanra Construction Co., Ltd. (former trade name: Hanra Construction Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Korea”) and Hanra Master Co., Ltd. (former trade name: hereinafter “Mara Master”) as affiliates of Hanra and Hanra, and the Plaintiff and Hanra Master, respectively, sub-leases part of the Osan Logistics Center to the Hanra, as follows (hereinafter “each sub-lease agreement of this case”).

On July 1, 2013, 201, the first-story, underground of the rent deposit (cost) of the lessee of the upper floor, was changed from the Hanmamast, to the Hanmast, 6,545.431, 315, 628, 700, 438, 542, 900, and 368.28.28,39, 100, 25, 779, 700 Hanmast, the lessee changed from the Hanmast to the Hanmast.

6,085.5.5 2,55,929, 200 425,98,200 1,217.45, 135, 373,00 24,674,600 3 6,453.62,516, 924, 400 419,487,400 410 6,382,382,382,702, 702, 397, 117,00 5 3,565.82641,845, 200, 106, 974, 200 410 3,5574,398,396, 307, 307, 300 3,00 40

C. However, on November 30, 2014, Hanmaman terminated each of the instant sub-lease contracts with the Plaintiff on October 20, 2015, Hanmaman, Korea.

On August 18, 2016, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate of claim for reduction of KRW 1,33,400,000 from KRW 2,333,400 per month to KRW 1,00,000 under Article 628 of the Civil Act on the grounds that the instant sub-lease contract is terminated, etc. by Hanmaman and Hanmaman’s each of the instant sub-lease contracts.

For this reason,