Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for eight months, for defendant B, for six months, for each of six months.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a prepaid phone (referring to a mobile phone that can communicate as much as the advance payment rate) with the trade name of "H" in Busan Dong-gu G 3406, Busan, and Defendant B is an employee of the above H division, DefendantN, and Defendant I is an employee of the above H with computerized work related to the opening of each mobile phone.

1. The Defendants’ joint crime (the “bande-user” refers to the transaction of communications circuits including personal information, such as the names, resident registration numbers, and copies of identification cards, among mobile phone distributors of mobile phones) is prohibited from using personal information or providing personal information to a third party beyond the scope of the purpose of collecting personal information, and does not knowingly receive personal information for profit or for an unlawful purpose, and does not change another person’s personal information without legitimate authority or beyond permitted authority.

However, around January 2014, the Defendants, at the above H, knew that he did not accurately confirm the subscriber's intent to subscribe through the subscriber's identification card and application, etc. when changing the user's name at the time of the change in the pre-paid name, using the program (the program granting the right to process, such as a new mobilephone and change of the name) of AB, which is a special telecommunications business operator, at the above H, and expressed the intent of Defendant A to trade another person's personal information. In general, Defendant A was in charge of the transaction and change of another person's personal information; Defendant B was in charge of the transaction and change of another person's personal information; Defendant B was in charge of soliciting and trading, such as the Internet car page opening for the termination of the pre-paid transaction; Defendant N, Defendant I, and Defendant I agreed to terminate the pre-paid transaction through access to and change of the name without permission.

Pursuant to the above conspiracy, the Defendants together with the above conspiracys, around February 3, 2014, at the above H office, etc., and Defendant B, at the NAV (A Q, AR, AR, and A D.