Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

【H (State)” (hereinafter referred to as “H”) is a foreign company in which Japan invested as a manufacturer of LROM glass plates within the old 4 U.S. Corporation, and (State) I is a H-in-house subcontractor.

On March 31, 2015, H(State) notified P(State) I of the termination of the contract for some of the contractors of H(State) on the grounds of a decrease in production quantity, etc., and (State) I recommended 16 workers to resign. (State) On May 29, 2015, KJ was established on May 29, 2015 by the employees of I.

On June 30, 2015, H (State) terminated the contract with the affiliate employees on the grounds of guaranteeing employment, etc. (State) and took measures to prohibit them from working in the H (State) factory of the employee of H (H). (State) as the employee of H (H) took procedures, such as desired retirement and dismissal, against the employee, the employee of H (H) demanded the withdrawal of dismissal and reinstatement from the site of H (H) factory, etc., and H (State) took action to cause conflicts with the members of the labor union who attempted to enter the factory by placing the employees at the site of the company, etc.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On October 7, 2015, the Defendants jointly committed the crime of Defendant A and Defendant E, with K, went into the factory after completing the clocket demonstration in front of the victim H (ju) factory located in the old-si L, Gu-si, and tried to enter the factory despite the victim’s policy and the proposal of security guards to prohibit entry into the factory, while putting the victim into the factory, putting him and her blickly, who was installed in the flick door and blick up until the front of the flick room through some flicks in which some flick door was put in front of the flick door.

2. On October 11, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime of Defendant A, jointly with M, K, and N, intruded a structure that is managed by the victimized person by entering a part of the sabane inquiry installed in a saf in a sash, notwithstanding the policy of prohibiting the said victim from having access to the saf in a place listed in paragraph (1) at around 23:21, 2015.

3. Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E.