1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver each real estate listed in Appendix 2;

B. 10,550,000 won and December 21, 2014

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is the previous owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

(hereinafter referred to as "the instant land", "the building 1", and "the building 2" as stated in Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2). B.

On August 9, 2012, upon the application of the Korean Land and Housing Corporation, the defendant's creditor, the decision to commence compulsory auction was made to Busan District Court D, and the registration of the entry of the decision to commence auction was completed on the same day.

C. However, in the process of conducting the auction procedure (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”), the said court determined that the instant building was already destroyed, and ordered the Korea Land and Housing Corporation to take appropriate measures, such as withdrawal of a request for auction against the said building, by notifying the said fact to the Korea Land and Housing Corporation through an order of correction on January 17, 2013. The Korea Land and Housing Corporation withdrawn the request for auction against the said building on January 24, 2013.

After that, the auction procedure was conducted for the instant land and the instant building and the instant building, which are the remainder of the real estate, and the instant building were awarded a successful bid and the Plaintiff paid the price on July 26, 2013, and acquired the ownership of each of the said real estate.

E. At present, on the instant land, buildings, such as the attached Table 2 Section 2 (2) (hereinafter “instant existing buildings”) are constructed.

[Reasons for Recognition] A without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4 through 9 (including branch numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1, and the result of the appraisal commission to Busan and Ulsan Metropolitan Government Headquarters Vice-Governor of Busan and Ulsan Metropolitan City, the purport of this court's inquiry about Busan Metropolitan City Mayor, the whole arguments, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. At the time of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the instant auction procedure, the building No. 2 was already destroyed.

However, after that, the defendant extended the building No. 1 of this case and present this case.