Seoul High Court 2009Nu6645 ( October 14, 2009)

National High Court Decision 2007west0955 (Law No. 27, 2007)

Whether a disposition of imposition on the premise that the apartment acquisition fund was donated by the husband is legitimate

There is no evidence to deem that there was a circumstance to avoid tax evasion, evasion of compulsory execution, or statutory restrictions on the Plaintiff’s husband and wife, and that the husband’s departure from the position of an officer of the company led to the necessity of title trust. Thus, this constitutes a valid title trust

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating