(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.12.20 2018고단3033

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.12.20 2018고단3033

강제추행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:55 on 06. 07. 07. 21:21:55, the Defendant: (a) left the chests of the victim E (the age of 34) who was released from the inner stairs of the opening 2 line located adjacent to “D store” in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant forcedly committed an indecent act against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A written statement of F (the defendant and his defense counsel are faced with the victim by hand and the defendant did not intentionally commit an indecent act against the victim;

The argument is asserted.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of this case, namely, the victim stated that the defendant was able to use the chest at the same time from the police to the court of this case while preparing the statement on the day of this case, but the defendant made a statement that the defendant was able to use both chests of the victim at the same time from the police to the court of this court. The victim's statement on the specific physical contact is not consistent only with the brief statement of the statement.

Rather, it cannot be said that the police and the court can recognize consistency in the statements of the victim, in light of the victim's legal statement attitude, credibility in the victim's statement, the victim resisted the victim's indecent act on the site immediately, and the defendant resisted about the indecent act on the part of the defendant without responding to it, and the witness's statement also appears to have observed the defendant's behavior as harming the victim, and this appears to have been expressed by the defendant's intentional contact rather than physical contact with the water that can be located in the subway history. In light of the above, the defendant committed an indecent act by selling as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment.

may be appointed by a person.

Therefore, the defendant.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2016.12.22 2016고합326

-의정부지방법원 2017.11.27 2017고단1313

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.25 2017노2635

-광주지방법원 2015.03.18 2014고합597

-대법원 2015.11.12 2014도5466