1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,031,086 as well as the annual rate from April 15, 2016 to May 12, 2016, and the following.

Facts of recognition

The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with B with the content that the Plaintiff would compensate for any loss incurred by inflicting bodily injury on another person due to an accident that occurred while the C motor vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “dive vehicle”) is owned, used or managed.

D, at around 12:20 on July 24, 2012, a family member of the insured under the above insurance contract B, 30 years of age or older, e-vehicle E (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, which was parked in the front part of the sea-going vehicle in the Sing-dong Sing-ri Village Parking Site, was shocked by the rear part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident.” On July 24, 2012 on the date of the instant accident, the Defendant was diagnosed by F Council members as having been in need of a 3-day stabilization price in light of the luxal base, the luxal base, and the luxal base, and thereafter received treatment from F Council members, etc. as stated in the “Details of Payment of Medical Expenses” from that time thereafter. The Plaintiff paid the sum of KRW 5,959,450 (except for No. 5,10 out of the details of the payment of medical expenses in attached Form 5,10), while the Defendant paid KRW 1,968,420 (attached Form 5,10), and paid KRW 50,000 under the pretext of agreement, for the purchase cost of the Defendant.

On the other hand, while receiving treatment from F Council members, the Defendant complained that there was no particular injury other than the injury such as the climatic dump, etc., but at the time of the instant accident, the vehicle Hand faced with the central part of this part at the time of the instant accident, and that there was a fry phenomenon (the phenomenon that one object appears to be two or more, and that there is a two picture) of the snow on the right side due to the shock. On September 3, 2012, the Defendant was diagnosed as a f2% of the climatic dump disease in the Dacheon-si Hospital and continued to undergo the diagnosis of the Macheon-si Hospital on May 12, 2013, the Defendant was judged to have been 62% of the climatic disorder and 59% of the fact-finding ratio of the climatic labor force in the Plaintiff through the adjustment assistant, based on this, the damage adjustment assistant was determined to the effect that the Plaintiff was 180,268,88.