logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.06.21 2018고단2468
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BMW 740i car.

On May 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven the above car on May 15:14, 2018, and went to the police road located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul; (b) committed a violation of the signal signal at 4 times in front of the exit zone located in Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul; and (c) committed a mistake that the designated passenger was arrested even though he was demanded to stop from the Seoul Sungdong Police Station C and the Inspector D belonging to the Seoul Sungdong Police Station; and (d) the police officer immediately

At around 15:25 on the same day, the defendant driving the above car, and operated the two-lane road in front of Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, along the shooting distance of Seoul Forest, at the Young-dong intersection, at an irregular speed of the road.

At the same time, many vehicles, such as passenger cars, have been standing in order to turn to the right at the intersection installed at the time.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well in the traffic situation of the front, to maintain a safe distance with the front vehicle, to accurately operate steering and brakes, and to prevent accidents by safely driving in accordance with the new subparagraph.

Nevertheless, in order to escape from the police attack by neglecting this, the defendant tried to overtake the pre-paid vehicles entering the center line, and returned to one lane on the road, and shocked the fronter on the left side of the victim's vehicle standing on the right side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant continued to flee without taking necessary measures, such as stopping the vehicle immediately and providing personal information to the victim, even though the repair cost of KRW 2,085,906, such as exchange of a spread due to the above occupational negligence, was damaged to the extent of the victim’s vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of traffic accident occurrence situation prepared by the F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

arrow