The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On August 6, 2016, at around 20:45, the Defendant used the victim’s work uniform at around 3:76 U.S. 104 Dong-dong 104, the Defendant committed assault, i.e., assaulting the victim’s breath, which was a dangerous object on the Defendant’s vehicle, and breading the victim’s breath, with the Defendant’s bath and breathing.

2. Although C’s major evidence corresponding to the above facts charged was written in this Court and in the investigative agency, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that the Defendant committed an assault, such as flabing and salkeing C’s breath while carrying a dangerous object, such as the above facts charged.

It is insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

A. C made a statement at an investigative agency to the effect that “A was subject to violence from the Defendant, who cited the Defendant’s own camping room in the process of checking whether the Defendant’s work clothes were returned from the door of work between the Defendant’s suffering,” but it changed the statement to the effect that “A was subject to violence from the Defendant, who was citing the Defendant’s own camping room in the first place, without reasonable grounds.” This court changed the statement to the effect that “I exchanged the Defendant’s work uniform with one another in his/her uniform, and was subject to violence from the Defendant, who took the Defendant’s own camping room in the middle of two seconds, due to the change in his/her work clothes.”

B. In addition to the facts charged, C made a statement to the effect that “the Defendant’s son who fats fats or fats fats fats hats hats hats hats hats hats hats hats hats hats hats,”

However, it is a physical structure that assaults the face of the other party with any hand in the state of breathing flapsing.