(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.17 2016노331 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.17 2016노331

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact misunderstanding: The judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant on the ground that it cannot be recognized that the defendant's aforementioned facts are erroneous and adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the fact that the defendant was not guilty, on the ground that the defendant was not guilty, because the camping room room, which is a dangerous object on the date stated in the facts charged, was abandoned by the victim's bridge part, and the victim's knee knee se see see see see se se se se

B. Hearing failure: Even if the defendant could not be found to have inflicted the injury on the victim by carrying a camping net, the court below erred by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as to the facts of assault by the defendant with a camping net, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. On April 2, 2015, the Defendant issued four students, who were sleeped in the alleyway in front of the Defendant’s house located in Ansan-si, G on April 2, 2015, leaving the gate gate gate (a dangerous substance of Aluminium material, length approximately 80cm) in the warehouse located adjacent to the Defendant’s house.

They came out of the country.

The defendant found the victim H (20 years old) who was living in the middle of the defendant's her return to the defendant, and she saw the victim as one of them, she saw the victim's her desire, and her up to the large direction her escape from the view of the victim's bridge. The victim obtained a car with approximately 100 meters of her escape and her escape from the victim, and followed the victim's her head, and followed the victim's her head, her knee, knee-type, multi-tampion, etc., which require the victim's treatment for about three weeks.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

3. Determination

A. The ex officio judgment prosecutor is at the trial.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.12.24 2015고단1110

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.06 2015고단6985

-서울남부지방법원 2018.06.01 2018고합160

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.12.04 2015고합95

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.23 2017고단227