logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.07.05 2017고단1176
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant had the intent to newly construct a tourist hotel with respect to the Jeonjin-gu and two parcels (hereinafter “the instant land”). The Defendant intended to purchase the instant land by taking over the secured debt of the right to collateral security established on the instant land and paying the difference to the owner, but the former North Bank of Korea operated the Defendant and the Defendant.

The E rejected it on the ground that the credit of E is not good.

Accordingly, the Defendant was willing to purchase the instant real estate in the name of the victim limited company F and to newly construct a tourist hotel. On October 2008, the Defendant borrowed the name of the victim company to G, a representative director of the victim company, to transfer the ownership of the instant real estate and to take over the secured debt, and to change the ownership and the name of the debtor within two months after the registration of transfer, and to allow tourism hotel to perform civil engineering works in the victim company.

In return, the real estate in this case and the above secured debt were transferred to the name of the victim company, but the above pledge was not observed until April 2010.

On April 2010, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant promised to obtain a loan from a bank located in Seoul to get a tourist hotel construction fund” from the representative director G of the victim company at the office of the victim company located in Y in Y in Y in Y in YY-gu, Jeonju-si. The bank demands F’s blank bills issued as security.”

However, the defendant did not have been promised to receive a loan from the bank for the new hotel construction fund, and there was no way to prepare the new hotel construction fund.

On April 13, 2010, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the delivery of a promissory note (I) with each blank of the date, from the above G on April 13, 2010.

2. The defendant's assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant’s summary of the assertion is objection.

arrow