beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff’s land purchase and co-ownership registration with K (hereinafter “L”) M M 1,447 (hereinafter “M land” without land category and size) were land owned by Nonparty N except when the first land is indicated. In addition, the Plaintiff completed the registration of 223/1,447 shares due to purchase and sale on May 10, 1968, and Nonparty K completed the registration as to the 1,224/1,447 shares due to sale on April 17, 1968.
B. The land improvement project under the Agricultural Community Modernization Promotion Act was conducted for the first land substitution M land. Accordingly, the land improvement project was conducted on September 28, 1971, and accordingly, it was replaced by P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q QP. The shares of the Plaintiff and K with respect to the existing land were transferred
C. On June 1972, Non-party R, the wife of the Plaintiff, completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on the whole P and Q land.
In around 1994, there was a land substitution according to farmland improvement projects for the above O, P, and Q land around 194.
In other words, the O land was replaced with JJ 1,476 square meters on June 2, 1994, and the shares of the plaintiff and K were transferred to the land after the land substitution.
In addition, P land and Q Q land were replaced with S 4,318 square meters on June 2, 1994, and the existing shares of the Plaintiff and K were transferred to the land after the said replotting.
E. The Defendants’ status K is the children of the Non-Party T, and died on or around August 1994 without having a child without marriage. Accordingly, K’s sibling (in the case of death, his heir) inherited K. As of the date of the closing of argument in this case, the Defendants’ heir shares as of the date of the closing of argument in this case are 4/20, Defendant B, D, and E, Defendant F, G, H, and I, respectively, 1/20.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry in Gap evidence 1 through 8 (including branch numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply) and the whole pleadings.