A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 16, 2014, at around 03:20, the Defendant: (a) intruded into the “D” factory operated by Ulsan-gu B Victim C (Nam, 57 years of age); (b) without any other entrance, the Defendant was parked in the cresh without any other entrance; and (c) two tampers (50cc) one tamper (50cc) one tamper (40cm) one tamper (40cm) one tamper (80cm) one tamper (80cm) one tamper (60cc), two micrometer (60cc) two tampers; (c) one tamper 2; and (d) one tamper (50cm); and (c) one tamper (10cm); and (d) six tamper (10cm); and (e) one tamper and two tamper and the Defendant loaded the tamper and the Defendant loaded the k and the Defendant loaded.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd another person's structure at night and stolen property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The reason for the suspended sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [Article 62(1) of the Act / [Article 62(1) of the Act / [Article 62 of the Act / [Article 62(4) of the Act / Special Mitigation Area (Article 4-1 and 6) / [Special Mitigation] / Special Mitigation Area

However, the amount of theft is minor, erroneous and reflects the fact that there are no criminal records and fines for the same kind of criminal records and fines, and the sentencing data recorded in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, etc. shall be determined as the order.