Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and four months, and Defendant C and D, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, B uses some space of law offices S, law firms N, and law firms T, while dealing with legal affairs such as personal rehabilitation and bankruptcy by lending the names of law firms and attorneys-at-law, and Defendant C and D are the attorneys-at-law who lent their names to Defendant A and B.

1. No person, other than a co-principal attorney-at-law in defendant A or B, shall handle legal affairs, such as representation, legal counseling or preparation of legal documents concerning non-contentious cases, in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits;

A. Nevertheless, the Defendants received KRW 500,000,00 from the S Office of Law Office in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, U. 1301 on September 26, 2012, and then prepared the application documents for personal rehabilitation in V and submitted them to the Gu Government District Court located in 23 U.S. 34-ro 34-ro Mayang-ro 34-ro Mayangyang-ro 23. From around that time to November 6, 2013, the Defendants received total amount of KRW 495,905,00 as fee and handled the case, such as personal rehabilitation, bankruptcy, and exemption, in the name of the attorney C, as described in attached Table 1.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to receive money and other valuables, and dealt with legal affairs concerning non-contentious cases such as individual rehabilitation, bankruptcy and immunity.

B. Defendants in charge of legal affairs using the name of Law Firm N, who received KRW 1,00,000,00 from the law firm N office located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government U. 9 level on November 7, 2013, and received KRW 1,00,000 from W as commission fees, and submitted W’s personal rehabilitation application documents to the Suwon-gu District Court located in the Suwon-si World Cup 120, Suwon-si. From around that time to February 12, 2014, as shown in attached Table 2, the Defendants received KRW 72,520,000 as commission fees in the above manner, and received KRW 72,520,000 under the name of Law Firm N (Attorney in charge) under the name of Law Firm N (Attorney C).