Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, as an attorney-at-law, was operating D of a law office in Seocho-gu Seoul Building from January 2013 to July 2013, 2013, and was the representative attorney-at-law of law firm E from July 2013 to July 2013.

From January 30, 2013 to January 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) from the above law office D and law office E offices; (b) from the name of an attorney-at-law and the name of an attorney-at-law, F, the head of personal rehabilitation office, who is not an attorney-at-law, obtained F, the name of an attorney-at-law, 1 through 96; (c) the list of crimes (G); (d) the list of crimes (H); (e) 1 through 108; (e) the list of crimes (J); (e) 1 through 113; (e) the list of crimes (K); (e) the list of crimes (L); (e) 1 through 33; (e) the list of crimes (M); (e) the list of crimes (O); (e) the list of crimes (P); (e) the list of personal rehabilitation (P); (e) the list of crimes (P); (g) the list of crimes (1 through 70; (7) the total number of crimes (5).

As a result, the defendant lent the name of Attorney A and E to F who is not an attorney-at-law and let F deal with legal affairs concerning non-contentious cases such as personal rehabilitation.

2. Defendant B is an attorney-at-law who had been operating U law office in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Telecommunication building from November 201.

From February 3, 2015 to December 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the U law office of U; (b) F, the director of an individual rehabilitation, who is not an attorney-at-law, using the attorney-at-law’s title B; (c) Nos. 97 to 118; (d) Nos. 246 to 362; (c) Nos. 109 to 201; (d) Nos. 114 to 198; (e) the crime sight list (K); (e) Nos. 102 to 183; (e) the crime sight list (M) Nos. 34 to 102; (e) the list of crimes (N) through 3 to 60; and (v) the list of crimes (V).