The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On June 13, 2013, around 15:30 on June 13, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by bringing one cellular phone (i.e., a product name: a gallon S3) equivalent to KRW 900,00 at the market price on which the victim E is the victim’s ownership on the table table.

2. However, the Defendant denied the instant crime on the ground that he did not steals the cell phone of the victim.

However, the direct evidence that can prove the facts charged among the evidence that the prosecutor submitted as evidence to prove the larceny of this case can include the victim's statement and CCTV image.

(s) The evidence is not consistent with the facts charged or is only prepared on the basis of the victim's statement.

The summary of the victim's statement is that the victim's statement can be copied at the cell phone store in which the defendant is working, while leaving the cell phone on the day of this case where the document can be copied.

기에, 복사를 하기 위하여 쇼핑백에 들어 있는 서류를 꺼내면서 그곳 원탁 위에 피해자의 휴대폰을 올려 놓았었는데, 월말 마감에 쫓겨 서두르는 바람에 깜박 휴대폰을 잊고 서류만을 챙긴 채 그냥 사무실로 올라갔고, 사무실에 도착하여 휴대폰이 없어진 사실을 알고 자신의 휴대폰으로 전화를 하였으나 전원이 꺼져 있었으며, 이에 다시 피고인이 근무하는 매장으로 내려가 휴대폰을 찾았으나, 찾지 못하였기에 피고인이 이를 숨기고 절취한 것이라는 주장이다.

B. According to the video images of CCTV installed in the shopping corridor before the store where the defendant works at the time of the CCTV image, the victim gets out of the store after completing the duplication (07 08 seconds), and the defendant immediately sees the direction of the victim's shooting at the site and gets out of the store where the victim left the store, and sees it toward the sales stand.