Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2014, at around 06:10, the Defendant was subject to investigation with respect to D in relation to the assault case in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju. However, while under the influence of alcohol at around 06:30 on the same day, the Defendant again found the zone as above C, and expressed her desire to “I do so, I do so, I do not know about how son is a bit of bitch bitch,” and the police officers, etc., who are public officials, “I do so, I do so, and me you can do so.” At around 06:10,000 won at the floor of the market price, which is a public object located on their books, and damaged public goods so that approximately KRW 1.20,000,000,000,000 won of the repair cost, such as cutting off part of the bit B’s upper end.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Photographs of damaged goods;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports (related to attachment of estimates of damaged goods);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is recognized that the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include: (a) the Defendant committed a crime against the police officer by finding the damaged police station on the following day of the instant case; (b) the Defendant sought death from the police officer; and (c) completed compensation for damaged articles; (b) the Defendant supports the pregnant wife and her child; (c) the Defendant appears to have supported the child; and (d) the Defendant has no criminal power over the fine, such as remitting money equivalent to the highest value of the parent’s thickness; and (e) there is no criminal power over the Defendant.

However, on the other hand, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant while under the influence of alcohol, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant since the nature of the crime is not considerably good. The equity in other similar cases, the age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and the crime.