1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties.

Basic Facts

The deceased G (Death on July 20, 1972) is the father and the father of the deceased H (Death on November 14, 1998), the city server of the plaintiff A, the plaintiff B and the defendant, and the deceased H is the spouse of the plaintiff A, the plaintiff B and the father of the defendant.

The land of this case was registered as the owner in the Dong G, G, and the land of this case (hereinafter “each of the instant land”). However, on June 21, 1995, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership preservation in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Real Estate Ownership (Act No. 4502; hereinafter “Act No. 4502”), by putting the said land into the same as the owner on June 21, 1995.

The letter of guarantee under the Act on the Special Measures is written to state that the cause for the transfer of ownership of each of the above I land is “the defendant purchases from G on September 1, 1985.”

The JJ seems to have mistakenly committed the “K” as “L”, while the F-related F-related F-related F-related F-related F-related F-related F-related F-related F-related F-related F-related F-related F-related F-si.

The registration of ownership preservation was completed in the name of "," but the defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 12, 2006, based on the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 7500, hereinafter "Act No. 7500") and completed the registration as a result of sale on October 7, 1992 by the Changwon District Court Scheon Registry No. 2699.

The letter of guarantee under the Act on Special Measures is written as follows: “The Defendant purchases the F land from H on October 7, 1992.”

[Grounds for recognition] The defendant asserted that Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence, and the purport of the whole pleadings by the plaintiffs asserted that each land of this case of this case was unregistered from the deceased G, and the defendant returned to the deceased G on September 1, 1985, which was the date when the defendant returned to the deceased G while the land of this case was not registered.