Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00 and by a fine of KRW 5,00,000, respectively.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
A is a person who operates the “A chemical laboratory,” and Defendant B is a person who was an instructor of the “F Art Research Institute.”
1. On January 23, 2015, Defendant A: (a) applied for the practical examination for new students of art colleges at the University of Arts in G in 2015, and failed to pass the practical examination for new students of Korean arts colleges at the University of Arts in G in 2015; (b) gathered six to seven students, such as H, I, etc. employed by the said chemical laboratory; and (c) and (d) “unfluent events arise.”
It is true that this speech will be scarcityd by a scarcity, and we will be able to overcome this situation with a lot of people who will be able to overcome this situation. At least, I think it should not occur in the North Korean Dos.
(A) Around the date of the practical examination at F (Art. 200), a course of study was conducted by changing the elimy day before the date of the practical examination.
However, this kind of farcing farcing was discussed.
Even if it is not necessary to do harm to F-J-J-J-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-
However, in relation to the date of entrance into the Republic of Korea at G University in 2015, the Defendant’s following: “The Victim K instructed the preparationrs for the F Institute of Art Research to practice in a clear and solid manner immediately before the practical examination,” and the victim J’s grading evaluation conducted by the victim J.
The phrase “M” in the L’s written indictment is merely a simple fact, such as misunderstanding (141 pages of investigation records) that “M appears to lack the description of some successful examinees and the scambling of drinking scams, etc.” from the victim, and it is also unreasonable when entering the victims.