The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

I. Facts charged

1. On May 28, 2012, at around 12:49, Defendant A sent a text message “I see why I will find it a school because I would have she find it at the low or inside of this son?” On the same day, at around 18:55, Defendant A sent a text message “I am ambling by cutting off,” and on June 1, 2012, “I am ambling. I am kne and kne kne knee,” not personal, regardless of whether I do not refuse to do so. The law that was not used in the year was fair, and that the text message “I am am kne and kne kne kne,” sent from the Defendant’s handphone to the victim’s cell phone so that I have reached the victim’s repeated text message creating fear or apprehension.

2. At around 14:30 on June 7, 2012, Defendant A damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out facts, by stating that “I would like to have sexual assault since D, inasmuch as D, it would have been sexually abused, it would be possible to bring about sexual assault.”

3. 피고인 A, 피고인 B는 공동하여, 2012. 10. 5.경부터 2012. 11. 2.경까지 E대학교 정문 앞에서 ‘성폭행, 가정파괴범(D 교수) E대 총장은 D 교수를 파면하라!!’는 내용의 플래카드를 게시하고, ‘성폭행 가정파괴범 D 교수를 파면하라!!’는 내용의 피켓을 들어 위 대학교 학생 등이 있는 가운데 공연히 사실을 적시하여 피해자의 명예를 훼손하였다.

Ⅱ In short, the facts charged are charged against the victim’s express intent under Article 74(1)3 or 44-7(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., and Article 2 and (3) of the facts charged are crimes falling under Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act. The facts charged are charges against the victim’s express intent under Article 74(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. and Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.