1. On the basis of the authentic copy of a notarial deed with executory power of No. 157, 2014, the Defendant, a law firm branch of C, on July 2014.

1. The Defendant’s judgment as to the cause of the claim was based on the executory exemplification of a notarial deed No. 157, 2014, which is a law firm branch of C, on July 3, 2014, and seized each of the corporeal movables listed in the attached attachment list (Korean Government District Court Decision 2014No. 4154) on July 3, 2014. However, among each of the above corporeal movables, 50 stuffs listed in paragraph (1) of the attached attachment list among each of the above corporeal movables can be acknowledged by the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 1 through No. 10, which is either a dispute between the parties or for whom the Plaintiff requested a letter to C by purchasing

According to the above facts, the compulsory execution against the corporeal movables listed in paragraph (1) of the attached attachment list shall not be permitted since it is unlawful as a compulsory execution against the corporeal movables owned by the plaintiff, not the debtor C.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.