logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2015.06.12 2015가합147
제3자이의
Text

1. No. 158 of 2014, the Defendant’s certificate of the preparation of a notary office against AWS Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On September 30, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) determined the due date for reimbursement of KRW 278,018,502 as of April 30, 2015; (b) concluded a transfer security agreement for corporeal movables owned by AAWS Co., Ltd; and (c) obtained certification by a notary public on October 27, 2014 as a law firm citizen, etc. for the purpose of securing the said agreement.

Therefore, 10, 11, 12, and 13 out of the corporeal movables listed in the attached attachment list are transferred to the plaintiff by means of the alteration of possession, and the plaintiff became a legitimate owner.

B. On November 7, 2014, the Defendant: (a) based on the authentic copy of a notarial deed with executory power of No. 158 of the No. 158 of the No. 158 of the No. 158 of the No. 2014, the Daegu District Court issued an enforcement officer affiliated with Kimcheon- support to seize the corporeal movables listed in

However, the plaintiff, who is the owner of 10,11,12, and 13 of the corporeal movables listed in the attached attachment list attached to the seized seizure, is not subject to compulsory execution from the defendant, and there is no reason to believe that compulsory execution is not possible.

2. Articles 208(3)1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act: A judgment without holding any pleadings;

arrow