beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
[Claim]
Reasons
1. Cases of indemnity between the insurers of vehicles involved in a traffic accident;
A. On March 13, 2018, the above road in front of the F-lane in Seongbuk-gu Seoul on March 13, 2018 at the location of the insured vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) Defendant Insured vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), such as the background of the accident, is the five-lane, and the first and the second two-lanes are the left turn, as shown in the attached Form, and the other two-lanes are the two-lanes. The two-lanes are installed between the three-lanes and the fourth-lanes, and the two-lanes are divided into the two-lanes between the two-lanes and the two-lanes. The two-lanes are divided into the two-lanes and the left turn turn turn.
The defendant vehicle turned on the direction of left turn from the intersection to the second safety zone, and was in progress at the fourth lane, and the plaintiff vehicle was in progress at the safety zone installed immediately preceding the intersection, and it is unclear whether the previous lane is one lane or not), while the front side of the plaintiff vehicle and the left side of the defendant vehicle were shocked from the second lane.
The payment of insurance proceeds shall be made on May 2, 2019 by deducting KRW 200,000 from the expenses for the repair of the plaintiff's vehicle.
B. The Plaintiff asserts that the accident of this case occurred due to the total negligence of Defendant vehicle, while changing a number of lanes in a lump sum, plucking, plucking, plucking, etc. of the safety zone into two-lanes, and did not turn on direction direction, etc., and did not go over, the Plaintiff asserts that the accident of this case occurred due to the total negligence of Defendant vehicle.
As seen above, the road at the location of the accident in this case is considerably complicated due to intersections, safety zones, etc., and is seen to have a high risk of accidents, so the driver of the vehicle is required to safely drive the road by checking the surrounding areas more well, and the defendant vehicle was proceeding from the time of the second safety zone installed from the intersection to the direction direction, etc., and the plaintiff.