1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows.

사고 당시 보험관계 원고 피보험차량 피고 피보험차량 C D 일시 2018. 2. 7. 21:26경 장소 과천시 막계동 양재과천의왕간 고속도로 상아벌 지하차도 지난 합류구간 충돌상황 원고 차량이 3차로로 진행하고 있었는데, 피고 차량이 원고 차량 전방 4차로에서 방향지시등을 켜고 3차로로 합류를 시도함. 피고 차량은 방향지시등을 계속 켠 상태에서 3차로와 4차로 사이 차선을 물고 진행하고 원고 차량은 계속하여 3차로로 진행하다

Plaintiff

The back of the vehicle and the left front part of the Defendant vehicle conflict. The payment of insurance money to 613,00 won / 613,00 won / there is no dispute, Gap 1, 3, 6 evidence, Eul 4's statement or video, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiff's vehicle could have sufficiently predicted that the vehicle of the defendant's vehicle is combined with the direction direction, etc. on the front side of the plaintiff's vehicle, so the vehicle of the plaintiff is proceeding without reducing the speed to not yield the course to the defendant vehicle. Although the defendant's vehicle started a vehicle immediately before the change of the two lanes between the three lanes and the four lanes into a white line, but the accident occurred after the vehicle stopped with the five white lines, it is difficult to see that the defendant vehicle attempted to change the lane before the start of the white line is the cause of the accident. Thus, it is difficult to see that the vehicle of the plaintiff's vehicle attempted to change the lane from the time the change of the lane begins until the accident occurred, to the point where the vehicle of the vehicle of the defendant's vehicle is running along the two lanes from the time the vehicle of the vehicle of the plaintiff's vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the defendant to the point where the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the plaintiff's vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the plaintiff's vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle.