A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On January 30, 2017, at around 13:55, the Defendant met the victim D (here, 32 years of age) who is his/her father’s father’s father’s father’s father’s father’s father’s father’s father’s son’s father’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Written statements made by the police and the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Application of CCTV image Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed against the Defendant

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The Defendant: (a) was aware that the victim, who is a member of the same family club, met with E, and the victim was in preparation for a public official test, and was aware that the victim was under preparation for a public official test, and there was only shotly discussed the victim in order to attract the victim; and (b) did not have any shotly knife the victim as indicated in the judgment, and did not have any knife the victim’s

B. Even if the Defendant had a somewhat physical contact between the victim’s view in the process, the Defendant’s shouldered the victim’s shoulder in order to attract the victim.

Even an indecent act is not considered an indecent act.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence to determine the first argument, the fact that the Defendant saw the victim as stated in the judgment, and was faced with the view of the victim can be acknowledged.

Therefore, the first argument is not accepted.

1) The victim was found in the police that "the defendant and F, who is a member of the family club, such as the father of the deceased and the defendant and the apartment in front of the apartment. The defendant was examined as to whether he was able to see that he was able to see that he was able to see that he was able to see that he was able to see that she was her next.