The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above punishment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. The lower court repeatedly committed each of the instant crimes against several victims, and repeatedly committed the same offense, and agreed with the Defendant with the victim E, Q, R, G, I, and P, under the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, and the victim C did not want the Defendant’s punishment, and took into account the favorable circumstances, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and motive for the commission of the crime, etc., and determined a sentence by taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s punishment was imposed; (b) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and motive for the crime.

Considering the fact that in the trial of a party, most of the victims do not want punishment of a defendant at the present time by agreement with the victim M and L, the father of the defendant was used in brain color, rehabilitation treatment is being performed, and continuous confinement of the defendant is likely to cause excessive difficulty to the family of the defendant because there is no other person than the defendant except for the defendant, etc., the punishment of the court below is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant's appeal is with merit, and the judgment below is ruled again as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence admitted by the court are the same as the corresponding columns of the judgment of the court below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act (Embezzlement of possession, selection of imprisonment), Article 330 of the Criminal Act (the thief and the thief of intrusion into night buildings and the thief of intrusion into residence at night), Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intrusion into residence, the choice of imprisonment), Article 329 of the Criminal Act (the intention, the choice of imprisonment, the choice of punishment), Article 70 (1) 3 (the use of stolen debit cards, the choice of imprisonment), Article 331-2 (the illegal use of automobiles, and the choice of imprisonment) of the Criminal Act concerning the preparation of a punishment for the crime;

1. The aggravated Criminal Act for concurrent crimes.