logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.09.17 2015고단1119
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 1119"

1. Around May 2014, the Defendant acquired one driver’s license, which is the owner of the victim C, in front of any entertainment station located in 438, which is the medium-si military unit, the Defendant: (a) obtained the victim C’s driver’s license.

The suspect did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. On November 30, 2014, the Defendant was required to present a driver’s license from the above E while working for a vehicle in the F office operated by E located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on November 30, 2014.

The defendant presented the first-class ordinary driver's license under the name of the commissioner of the NA, which is a public document acquired and possessed as stated in paragraph 1, as if the defendant was the defendant's driver's license.

Accordingly, the defendant did not use official documents.

3. The Defendant forged a private document at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph 2, stated “G”, “H” in the vehicle number column, “I” in the resident registration number column, and “C” in the lessee’s name column on the vehicle number column, using a tample on the paper of the vehicle rental contract in which the Defendant had been located.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a vehicle rental contract in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

4. The Defendant at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, and displayed the forged vehicle rental contract to the above E, who was aware of the forgery, as if it were a document duly formed.

The Defendant, “2015 Go-Ma1951,” inserted a phrase “sale of opphone6” on the Internet opening site around January 12, 2015, along with the pro-Japanese J, to the victim K, who reported the above writing and contacted with the victim K, who first deposits KRW 490,000 in sales price.

arrow