A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The prosecution against rape in the facts charged of this case is dismissed.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On November 8, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for special larceny by the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 16, 2013.

[2] The Defendant, along with the Defendant, committed sexual traffic with the Defendant, using the victim D (Inn, E) level 3 of this intellectual disability, with the victim D (in response, with lack of ability to discern things or make decisions, in order to have the victim engage in sexual traffic and to collect the money which the victim has punished, and the Defendant, along with B, means “F” with the Internet hosting site “F, smartphone display”, “G, etc., and the victim did not engage in sexual traffic any longer.

In other words, “the victim is forced to be forced once more so that the victim may not refuse,” and “C also went to the place where the victim would meet with the male number of the sexual purchase, and upon the completion of sexual traffic, the contact plays a role of monitoring the victim so that the victim may not flee, and the victim shall exercise power so that the victim may not refuse or escape from sexual traffic, by playing a role of getting the victim who has completed sexual traffic and play a role of getting the victim from sexual traffic.

On May 12, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with B and C, sought a sex purchase by accessing F by using the PC from the motherel PC located near the large area located in Daegu Northern-ro 161, Daegu Northern-ro, 161, and C, monitoring that the victim does not flee, and monitoring that the victim does not flee, C, while making the victim take back the victim and let the victim take 1,50,000 won at one time from the above sex purchaser, and had the victim take the sex trafficking and receive 1,50,000 won at one time from the above sex purchaser, while monitoring that the victim does not escape, and then, the victim took back the said payment back to the said telecom while monitoring that the victim does not escape, and then became divided into Defendant and B.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with B and C, from May 12, 2013 to May 2, 2013, was in collusion with B and C, at the average of two times from May 12, 2013, 161.