logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.16 2017고단8521
모해위증
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, as a financial director of the Company D, was in charge of the management of the company’s funds, accounting, etc., and E was the representative director of the said Company, who was in charge of the lecture against the students, and F was working as an employee of the said Company as a staff member of the E University.

Under the Defendant’s initiative, D Co., Ltd. filed a complaint with F, and F was charged with occupational breach of trust with the Seoul Eastern District Court on June 29, 2015 (Seoul Eastern District Court 2015 order 1612). One separate complaint was filed against the Defendant to the Seoul East District Court for embezzlement on May 26, 2014. On September 25, 2015, the Defendant was not detained due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) with the Seoul Central District Court on September 25, 2015 (Seoul Central District Court 2015Gohap 890). On October 2, 2015, 2015, E was present as a witness on the foregoing F, and the Seoul District Court 2015 order that he was not guilty of the charges of perjury as Seoul High Court 201Mo1614 decided December 17, 2013.

Criminal facts

The Defendant, upon the accusation of E, was indicted for embezzlement and tried at a trial as above, had E attend as a witness in the above Seoul Eastern District Court 2015 order 3890 order order, and the facts were not E but the Defendant’s written statement on December 17, 2013 order, but was made in a computer. However, the Defendant made a false statement as if E was written, and had E receive criminal punishment for perjury.

Accordingly, the defendant around 16:30 on May 23, 2016 is Asan-ro in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul.

arrow