logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고단3338
경매방해
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

A or B fails to pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 4, 2015, the Seoul Eastern District Court P on the building located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant building”), the voluntary auction procedure was commenced on March 12, 2015 as Seoul Eastern District Court Q, and the voluntary auction procedure was commenced on April 7, 2015 as the Seoul Eastern District Court R.

The Defendants conspired to report the false lien, and the fact that the construction of the instant building was completed at the S church is after the commencement of the above voluntary auction procedure, and even though the construction cost falls short of the amount stated in the report of the lien, Defendant A submitted to the Seoul Eastern District Court around March 10, 2016, a lien report stating that “S church Co., Ltd. entered into a lease contract with T Co., Ltd., the representative director, and completed remodeling works in full amount of KRW 230 million,” and Defendant C submitted the lien report stating that “The construction cost falls short of the amount stated in the report of the lien.”

3. 18. A lien report is filed with the Seoul Eastern District Court stating that a lien shall be exercised on the instant building with the amount of KRW 23 million for the construction cost of the instant building as the secured claim, and Defendant D shall be subject to the same year.

3. 18. A lien report stating that the Seoul Eastern District Court shall exercise a lien on the building in this case with the amount of KRW 25 million for the construction cost of the building in this case as the secured claim, and Defendant F shall be the same year.

3. 18. A lien report was filed with the Seoul Eastern District Court stating that the right of retention is exercised on the instant building with the amount of construction cost of KRW 45 million as the secured claim, and Defendant G is the same year.

3. 18. A lien report filed with the Seoul Eastern District Court stating that the right to retention shall be exercised on the instant building with the amount of KRW 7.5 million for the construction cost of the instant building as the secured claim, and Defendant H shall be the same year.

3. 18. Buildings in this case at the Seoul Eastern District Court

arrow