A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 2015] The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. From the end of April 2014, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s residence in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan B apartment 903, injected two water in a single-time medication volume (0.03g of approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs) together with C, with psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related to himself/herself and C, and the Defendant, respectively, injected them into the psychotropic body.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C to administer philophones.

2. The Defendant, on January 2015, 2015, injected with two water in a single-use injection machine for the instant injection machine with C at the Defendant’s residence located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dtel 1520, and then injected with the Defendant and C in his own arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C to administer philophones.

3. The Defendant, at around 22:00 on May 16, 2015, injected one-time medication of phiphones into water in a single-use injection machine at the same place as paragraph (2). After dilution with water, the Defendant injected with his/her arms in his/her arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant administered philophones.

[2015 order 2718] The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On July 1, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car on July 1, 2015, and passed the front road of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on a school-based side from the gluscin golf slope to the gluscin golf slope.

Since there is a road on which one-way road sign is marked, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the above sign, the defendant neglected to do so, and caused the victim to go beyond the road by taking her traw part of the victim G (V, 59 years old) who was walking in front of the direction of the defendant's proceeding in the negligence of driving the one-way road.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above business is weak to the victim.