logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.02.06 2019나35012
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The defendant asserts that the defendant is not liable for damages since the disciplinary action in this case was decided by the agreement of the H Committee.

However, the H Committee or the defendant, the chairperson of the H Committee, did not legally delegate any authority to take measures to restrict the use of the bulletin board to C members, and the defendant, however, has taken measures to restrict the use of the message board in this case which are obviously null and void, so the defendant is liable to compensate for damages

The disciplinary action of this case was decided through the agreement of the committee without authority.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow