1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the plaintiff added a judgment on the newly raised argument with respect to the interest of dismissal and confirmation as follows, and thus, the same shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the second sentence of the judgment of the first instance, the "Plaintiff" shall be deemed to be the "Defendant".

The fourth first instance court's decision " March 8, 2012" shall be deemed " March 8, 2017."

The 4th 3th and 6th 7th 7th of the judgment of the first instance shall each be called "K for the witness of the first instance court".

6-7 pages 6-7 of the first instance court's judgment "each description of Gap evidence 1 through 8, Eul evidence 4 through 7, and evidence 11 through 13" shall be read as "A evidence 1 through 8, 12 through 15, Eul evidence 4 through 7, 11 through 13, and 16," respectively.

The 6th 10th 10th tier judgment of the first instance court "not more than 11 executive officers appointed by the chairperson" shall be "7 executive officers (the number of executive officers shall not exceed 11, including the chairperson according to the rules of the H Committee) appointed by the chairperson."

The whole part of the 8th judgment of the first instance shall be deleted from the 5th judgment to the 18th judgment.

2. Determination as to the part of the claim for invalidation confirmation

A. With respect to the instant restriction on use, the Plaintiff filed a claim for damages with the Seoul Western District Court as the Seoul Western District Court No. 2018Gadan225763 (hereinafter “instant case”), but it may not be recognized as a party’s standing to the claim. Since K is delegated by the Defendant with the authority to engage in the same act as the instant disciplinary action, the instant claim against the Defendant is an appropriate means to restore the Plaintiff’s status or right. Of the instant restriction on use, the “B bulletin board additional one year limit” in the instant restriction on use is currently ongoing, and the period of “B bulletin board No. 1 year restriction” is not only the period of “B bulletin board No. 1”.