logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.13 2017나65526
손해배상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim extended by this court are all dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after the appeal are filed.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a non-profit corporation established on April 10, 1996 in order to promote the correct understanding of the international community on Korea and the promotion of international friendship through the international exchange and cooperation business of broadcasting, and is operating C, D, and other E to carry out the overseas satellite broadcasting business to enhance the national image and promote the understanding of the international society. 2) The Defendant is a person who served as a representative of E from December 11, 2014 to February 2, 2016.

B. The Defendant, while holding office as the president of E, was performing overseas business trip duties as follows in 2015 for the activation of international business and entry of C into F.

During the business trip period, non-U.K. (S.), Spanish (S.), Spanish (Madrid, etc.) traveling along the business trip.

Above 200 up to or up to 27

3. 8.21,061,453 G, etc., two U.S. (new bathing).

5.5. Above 1000

5. Nov. 17, 170,932 United States of America (new business trip).

Above 7. 12

7. 17.17.649,585 H H United States (new bath)

9. 24. Above 10

9. 30. 19,338,868 H 2 French ( Paris), Belgium (Belgium) 11.29 to 12.3. 15,386,119 I

C. From February 2016 to March 3, 2016, the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism conducted a special audit as to the appropriateness of the details of use, such as business promotion expenses and overseas travel expenses executed by the Defendant while serving as the president of E. In addition, the above audit results were comprehensively taken into account in May 2016, that “the Defendant used the business travel expenses and business promotion expenses inappropriately in violation of internal regulations, such as the travel expense rules and the guidelines for the execution of business promotion expenses, the Plaintiff prepared a plan to recover the relevant business promotion expenses and withdrawn measures, such as demanding the person in charge of the settlement of accounts to pay attention,” the Plaintiff sent a written request for disposition of the audit results (Evidence 1).

The improper details of use indicated in the above written request for disposition shall be as follows:

Determination of the amount to be claimed for a separate return

(a) Attached Form 367,681 of the payment of the taxi expense corporation card at the time of the business trip of a foreign business trip.

arrow