logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.07.19 2017구합63405
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. On February 1, 2017, the Defendant’s information stated in the attached Form 1 Information Disclosure Claim List against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 3, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a claim for information disclosure with the Defendant on the detailed details of the execution of reserve funds (including the date of execution, purpose of execution, content of execution, amount of execution, place of execution, number of persons present, type of receipts, etc.) from June 3, 2016 to December 12, 2017, ② the detailed details of the execution of special activity expenses and indirect operating expenses (including the date of execution, purpose of execution, content of execution, amount of execution, place of execution, number of persons present, number of persons present, type of receipts, etc.) used from June 3, 2016 to June 12, 2016, and ③ from June 2016 to June 12, 2016, to request for the disclosure of information on the details of execution (including the date of execution, purpose, place of business trip, number of persons present, details of execution of expenses, etc.) such as travel expenses

B. On February 1, 2017, the Defendant, on the ground that “(i), (ii) the reserve funds of the National Assembly, (iii) the details on the execution of expenses for special activities, and (iii) the travel expenses and travel expenses at the time of overseas business trips of the Chairperson and the Information Committee, etc.” fall under Article 9(1)2 and 5 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”), made a decision to disclose the portion of information to disclose only the remainder of the information except for the information. From June 12, 2016 to June 12, 2017, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a written statement on the execution details of travel expenses, travel expenses, equipment, etc. used by members of the National Assembly for overseas business trips, other than the Chairperson and the Information Committee, including the details on the execution of each unit project of the National Assembly’s reserve funds, special activities, and the travel expenses, travel expenses, etc. used at the time of overseas business trips, as the items under the jurisdiction of the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter referred to as “each information of this case” in the separate sheet No. 1 list, which is subject to non-disclosure decision, and the defendant’s decision not to disclose this case is referred to as the “disposition of this case”). [The grounds for recognition] does not dispute.

arrow