1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 75,713,673; (b) KRW 72,713,673; and (c) KRW 72,713,673 to Plaintiff B; and (b) from October 8, 2016 to each said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) On October 8, 2016, C: (a) around 00:18, 2016, D buses (hereinafter referred to as “instant sea-related vehicles”);

The following Ma2 vehicle driving: (a) the intersection in front of the Bupyeong-dong Sinpoon Elementary School in Chungcheongnamyang-gu, Chungcheongnamyang-gu, Chungcheongnamyang-gu, Chungcheongnamyang-do, is going straight from the parallel surface to the parallel surface at a speed of about 71km per hour at the speed of about 71km per hour among two laness. C is the E-learning car (hereinafter “victim”) which left the left to the right from the right side of the parallel at the right side of the Pyeong-dong, Seoyang-dong, Seoyang-dong, Seoyang-gu.

Next, the left side part of the vehicle Ma1 vehicle was shocked with the part front of the right side of the instant Aquatic Vehicle. The network F (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) being accompanied by the instant damaged vehicle due to the said traffic accident is deemed to be the network F (hereinafter referred to as “the network”).

) The instant traffic accident was killed due to serious cerebral injury on its job (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

(2) The place where the instant accident occurred is children protection zone and the speed of restriction is 60 km each hour.

In addition, since the land level at the time was milched, there was a duty to drive at a speed of less than 48 km per hour when the speed limit is reduced by 20/100.

3) The deceased, who is the mother of the instant damaged vehicle, is the operator of the instant damaged vehicle. 4) The Plaintiffs are the deceased’s children, and there are no other inheritors.

The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the limited partnership company which is the owner of the vehicle of this case.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the police transport company, the owner of the instant victimized vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's 1 to 7, 10, 11 (including each number number), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition as the ground for the liability for damages, the defendant is a mutual aid business operator for the instant Maritime Vehicle, due to the accident in this case.