1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. During the process of the disposition, the Plaintiff’s short-term visit of sojourn status (C-3) on October 8, 2013, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the date of application for refugee status recognition (C-3) on February 16, 2017, which was the date of the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”): The fact that there is no ground for rejection of the decision made on March 13, 2017 as of the date of application for objection that there is no ground for rejection of the decision made on December 7, 2017; the fact that there is no ground for rejection of the decision made on March 13, 2017; the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 1 and 2; and the purport of the entire pleadings, as well as the purport

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a national of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”) and a vice versa.

The plaintiff was a proposal to be married from a single-slick male when he was in the Pakistann University, but rejected it.

In this regard, the male did not know the name of the plaintiff to the organization opposing the reading.

Since then on October 2013, the plaintiff's male-friendly Gu was assaulted from those who belong to the organization opposing the lag.

As such, the Plaintiff’s return to Pakistan is likely to cause another threat on religious grounds, and thus, it should be recognized as a refugee.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, or a foreigner who is not able to return to or does not want to return to the country of nationality before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” In full view of the following circumstances revealed by adding up the evidence and the purport of the entire arguments in Articles 3 and 4 as well as the evidence as stated above.