1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. In the course of the disposition, the following facts are: (a) there is no dispute over the grounds for rejection of the decision of the decision of the Supreme Court on July 28, 2017 as of the date of application for refugee status recognition (B-2) on May 24, 2017; (b) the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on June 8, 2017; and (c) there is no ground for rejection of the decision of the decision of the Supreme Court on December 7, 2017 as of the date of application for objection: (a) there is no ground for rejection of the decision of the decision of the Supreme Court on December 28, 2017; (b) Gap evidence, Eul evidence, and evidence Nos. 1 and 2; and (b) the purport of the entire pleadings as of the whole.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a national of the Egypt Republic of Egypt (hereinafter "Egypt").

After leaving the Egypt, the plaintiff puts a letter against the present Egypt government that B turns out by the President, on the Internet.

However, the Egypt government, however, has been harming people who oppose themselves in prison, and in fact, Egypt police was found to be the plaintiff's house in Egypt around December 2017, and asked the plaintiff's movement.

If the plaintiff returned to Egypt, he/she is likely to be subject to stuff such as arrest on the ground that he/she performed anti-government activities.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “any foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, or who is a stateless foreigner who is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) When comprehensively considering the evidence and evidence set forth in subparagraph 3 as well as the evidence set forth in subparagraph 1 as well as the following circumstances revealed by adding the purport of the entire pleadings to the statement in subparagraph 3, the Plaintiff’s race, religion, nationality, and specification.